Philipp Krueger | Daniel Metzger | Jiaxin Wu
The Power of Explaining Your No: How Investor Vote Rationales Drive Corporate Change
When institutional investors cast their votes against company directors, they increasingly do something that was once rare: they explain why. These “voting rationales” — brief written explanations accompanying dissenting votes — are emerging as a surprisingly effective tool for driving corporate governance reform, according to new research analyzing nearly 800,000 such disclosures.
Ethnic Diversity and Corporate Interstate Investments
Ying Mao | Zheng Wang | Hong Zou
Toward Momentary Exposomics in Climate Health: Profiling Environmental Exposure Variability Using Sensor-Based Data in Hong Kong
Awardees: Kate Burrows, Diane Lauderdale, Peter Keumseok Koh
Ecological Impacts of Industrial Production in China
Awardees: Eyal Frank, Guojun He, Shaoda Wang
Incentivizing Citizens to Participate in Environmental Governance: A Field Experiment
Awardees: Guojun He, Shaoda Wang, Michael Greenstone
Long-Run Ecological Roots of Climate Attitudes and Support for Climate Change Policies
Awardees: Thomas Talhelm, Jiaqi Yu
Voting Rationales
Roni Michaely | Silvina Rubio | Irene Yi
Duel Network Effects in the EV Transition: Rise of Charging, Decline of Gas Stations
Awardees: Hyuk-soo Kwon, Jasmine Hao, Jinge Li
Non-Financial Liabilities and Effective Corporate Restructuring
Bo Becker | Jens Josephson | Hongyi Xu






